WHAT WOULD YOU SAY? Once A Woman, Always A Woman?

If a Supreme Court Justice is unable to provide a definition of a “woman,” should we conclude that person is alarmingly deficient of common sense, purposely being evasive or merely attempting a subtle bit of mockery?

Screenshot from YouTube.

Actually, then-Supreme Court Justice nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson was defended by more than a few people in the media, academia, the legal community and cultural celebrities.

Why? Because the notion that “man” and “woman” are no longer understood to mean what they have respectively meant since the first chapter of the first book of the Bible was penned by Moses thousands of years ago.

And why is that? Has some scientist somewhere discovered a hitherto unknown fact that the Law of Non-Contradiction — That which is A cannot also be Non-A — has been repealed?

The Colson Center’s latest “What Would You Say?” video lays it out: