Irreducible Complexity, the Incredible Miracle of DNA and Intelligent Design

When Charles Darwin wrote “The Origin of the Species” in 1859, the conventional wisdom held that the single-cell ameba was the original starting point in the evolutionary development of life on Earth.

The conventional wisdom of the mid-19th Century also held that the single-cell ameba was quite simple, hardly more than a tiny glob of elements that came together by chance in a prehistoric pool of watery goo. Scientists of Darwin’s day simply didn’t possess magnification tools sufficient to examine single-cell amebas in deep detail.

But then came the discovery of DNA not long after Darwin published, and in the 20th century the explosion of knowledge and understanding of DNA launched by scientists Francis Crick and James Watson and on to the present. We are only just beginning to grasp the incredible complexity and functions of DNA.

Darwin’s theory may well be the most reasonable explanation of the development of life after its origin, but in my view and that of a host of others who are much smarter than me, it cannot explain how the first living cell came into existence or the amazing complexity of it. There is, in other words, an irreducible complexity to the origins issue for which evolutionary theory is not the most reasonable explanation.

That is why as more is known about DNA, the ranks of intelligent people, including many top scientists, view Intelligent Design as the most reasonable explanation for the origin of life. Saying that does not exclude some form of theistic evolution or the multiple processes of adaption seen in the natural world.

Check out the following animated video about a couple of DNA characteristics that require multiple steps to be completed in a specified sequence. The discrete origin and survival of that sequence is an illustration of irreducible complexity.


IS THIS YOUR FIRST VISIT TO HILLFAITH?

IT’S ABOUT TAKING THE GOSPEL TO CAPITOL HILL AIDES

CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THIS UNIQUE MINISTRY

Are You Following HillFaith Yet?

3 Comments

  1. Ben on February 4, 2022 at 8:48 am

    How is this not just a re-hash of “god of the gaps?”

    • Mark Tapscott on February 4, 2022 at 10:05 am

      Ben, the “God of the Gaps” claim is a rhetorical evasion used by atheists to avoid confronting the concrete arguments of advocates for the existence of God. To say religious faith is nothing more than what we use to explain what is not yet understood – the “gaps” – ignores the substance of the argument based on logic and evidence.

      J. Warner Wallace does a far better job than I of responding to the Gaps device: https://youtu.be/RUcfmyXSU8U

  2. Faithfilled reader on February 4, 2022 at 9:06 am

    For an in-depth examination of the extreme chemical pitfalls for the materialistic abiogenesis of a living cell check out the video series by Dr. James Tour linked below. This link is for the complete 13-part series. His youtube channel also offers separate links for each of the 13 parts. Dr. Tour presents his academic credentials and his standing within the synthetic organic chemical community in the introductory segment of the series. His analysis is detailed and referenced throughout.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKLgQzWhO4Q

Leave a Comment